|
|
|
| Home
/ History
/ Portland
and Weymouth / Dorset's Coastal Defences |
| |
| High Angle Battery |
| |
| Source: Various (please see
Site Credits) |
Click any picture to enlarge
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| In 1888 new 12.5
inch Rifled Muzzle Loading cannons replaced the 9 inch RMLs
in many of the forts and some of the smaller guns were moved
in 1892 to a new battery in the quarry just south of the Verne
citadel. This battery was designed so that the guns could be
fired at a high angle their shells plunging onto the vulnerable
decks of attacking warships whose sides were protected by thick
armour. As well as gun positions the battery had magazines and
shelters for the guncrews who were accommodated in the Verne.
Rail lines carried the shells from the magazines to the muzzles
of the guns. |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
| 9 inch cannon in high angle role, High
Angle Battery, at about 1900 |
|
|
The High Angle Battery had positions for eight
guns but only six were ever mounted. The guns remained in
use until 1906.
The Theory of High Angle Fire
The High Angle Battery at Portland is both an
integral part of the defences of the Fortress of Portland
when they were at their greatest extent and the best preserved
example of this type of Battery in the United Kingdom. High
Angle Batteries had a very short existence in British coastal
defences but were adopted enthusiastically elsewhere, notably
in the United States.
|
|
 |
| RE Plans for a standard high angle battery |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Krupp, in 1879, had
tested an 11 inch rifled howitzer which, at a range of over
7,000 yards, would have scored many hits on the deck of a battleship.
Plunging fire on the deck would be far more destructive than
blows on the armoured sides, and though armoured decks had been
introduced in the ironclad HMS Alexandria and the armoured cruiser
HMS Shannon in 1872, the armour was thinner than on the sides
of the ship and much damage would be done even if the armoured
deck was not penetrated |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
| The High Angle Battery, positioned to
the south of the Verne citadel |
|
|
 |
| 9 inch HA gun |
|
|
 |
| RE plans for a magazine |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
The Development of the High Angle gun
In the early 1880's the Admiralty conducted
experiments with deck armour; 2 inch steel plates just kept
out nose-hardened shells and 2 inch wrought iron plates easily
kept them out. The siting of the new weapons at Portland was
first suggested in December 1885 by the Royal Artillery and
Royal Engineers Works Committee. The requisite guns were developed
from the old 9 inch RML, which had shot indifferently up to
about 4,500 yards. In 1884 one was relined with polygroove
rifling replacing the original Woolwich grooves and a different
twist given to the rifling, and the carriage was adapted to
fire at 35 degrees of elevation. A better proportioned projectile
was also employed. This was an economical updating of obsolete
weapons. Old guns whose bores were eroded were fitted with
new tubes incorporating the changes. The cost of this was
about £340 per gun, with the mountings coming to £280: if
made from new the cost would have been £848. The gun was mounted
on its old carriage and platform so modified as to offer 35
degrees of elevation, giving a range of 10,000 yards. On trials
at a distance of 10,000 yards the error on range proved to
be only 10.2 yards, and the error in direction only 3.4 yards;
the time of flight was 48 seconds. It was hoped that the position
finding device used in conjunction with the gun could lay
down the range to within 20 yards at a range of five miles.
By January 1886 the Inspector-General of Fortifications and
the Director of Artillery could state that recent experiments
with the gun converted into a howitzer had proved that such
weapons would be most effective. However, it was a fact of
ballistics that high-angle fire and high velocity were incompatible,
and as penetration varied as the square of the velocity, the
penetrating power of howitzer shells fired at high angles
and with comparatively low velocity was small. On the other
hand, the flotation power of ships was limited and if the
sides were protected by thick armour, the decks could not
be protected by heavy armour also. The practicable limit for
deck defence at the time seemed to be 3 or 4 inches of steel,
considered penetrable by 9-in. or 10-in. shells. However,
if the ship was rnoving then the chances of hitting would
be much reduced; the lengthy time of flight of the projectile
- as seen above, 48 seconds at 10,000 yards - together with
all the other variables, clearly vastly increased the difficulty.
But then the accuracy of fire of the ships themselves would
be enormously decreased by firing on the move, so a great
object would still be gained. In November a second Report
on the Revision of Armaments of Portland was produced.
The provision of a battery of four high angle guns for the
Verne Citadel was confirmed, the guns to be the MarkVI 9 inch.
This had a maximum elevation of 75 degrees with an all-round
traverse of 360 degrees
|
|
| |
| |
| TOP |
| |
|
|
 |
© Copyright 2003 · Cyberport Project Ltd · All Rights Reserved · Site design by CoDesign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|